Specifications and the doctor's advice to listen to whom?

There sufferers to reflect the 5-year-old child suffering from a cold. DoctorsCheckDiscovered that the child throat irritation, spoke up at the counter on the clothes of penicillin. She returned home to their children before treatment, casually looked at brochures, Who would have thought that to see her 'no direction', insert clearly stated on those who are allergic to penicillin is disabled, while the child she is not allergic to penicillin知道. In her memory, want to know how to do a skin test allergic to penicillin, while the doctor did not request. The case of oral penicillin drug does not cause an allergic reaction, then why is it necessary to remind the insert? This drug is to eat or not eat? "

Note: doctors to patients when the use of oral penicillin, did not ask patients about their allergy history or remind them of their practices do first skin test is not only inconsistent with the instructions, but also inconsistent with the conventional clinic belonging to a doctor's negligence is very dangerous.

Point of view: It should be said,DrugsAlthough the process of manual medicine to declare the subject of many experts recognized the audit, but also have some legal authority, but doctors have only one drug user manual and, therefore, there may be understanding and memory of the instructions on the Some of bias or even negligence at work, although the probability of this happening is very low, but as the patient takes medication to stay in the former are much more in mind, not only during treatment require careful to ask the doctor, take medicine before the drug must also be carefully read instructions to reduce the medication errors from occurring.

Recommendation: Once the difference between the two, the patient would first like to question a doctor, if doctors can not fully explain why this open doctor's advice, then the doctor must bear the corresponding responsibility, because the doctor has a legal obligation to act responsible for their medical .

A woman due to throat irritation and health care, hope the doctor gave her a prescriptionAnti-inflammatory drugs. Doctors listen to her describe the EndSymptomsLater, opened herAntibiotics, The woman returned home to read a drug description, I saw read, attending urinary tract infections, intestinal infections. She was confused. Insert I did not write this type of medicine can cure respiratory infections, she hesitated and did not dare to take, but also ask questions back to the hospital to doctors. Later, the doctor told her that the drug through clinical trials confirmed that the treatment of respiratory infections result is good, has expanded the original indications, but the original statement has not been updated, the woman leave with satisfaction.

Note: No respiratory indications of antibiotics have been opened to the respiratory tract infection may be an effective drug indeed respiratory tract infections, is on the clinical indication of a new understanding on. But in any case, doctors should be patient to explain clearly to the government.

Point of view: In clinical practice, many doctors through clinical accumulation, with some super-drug approach for many patients with instructions to improve the symptoms, eliminate illness, bringing the "Gospel." For example, the need to use methotrexate for treating rheumatoid arthritis is Rheumatoid immunology treatment protocols, but the drug has yet recorded in the Chinese description of the indication. This indicates that the use of certain drugs in clinical practice a certain degree of expansion, as long as its theoretical basis and practical evidence to prove safe and effective, it can in some respects, there are new developments.

In accordance with starting May 1 this year, introduced a new "Prescription Management Measures", medical practitioners in exceptional circumstances to have supernatural powers of the instructions require the use of drugs, but it must have a sufficient basis, and the doctor has to be expressed through re-signing of their responsibility .

Recommendation: Once the difference between the two, they can raise objections to doctors. If the doctor can explain this is a special usage and indicated that responsible, such as the re-signing, you can believe a doctor. In other words, we should respect the doctor's medical advice.

In short, as a patient, the doctor should have a basic trust. When necessary, you can doctor's prescription or a doctor's advice to challenge, but it must be patiently listening to a doctor's explanation, in their justifiable circumstances, we should consciously obey doctor's orders, in accordance with established medical clinics, plans to check and treatment. As a doctor, in actual drug approach is inconsistent with the statement, the doctor should first be required to inform the patient, and make the necessary instructions on the prescription and signature, so that patients understand it properly